tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-808773819247718476.post924904268706308612..comments2012-07-02T15:42:32.431-04:00Comments on Diogenes' Lantern: The Arizona Bill: A Good Place to Start the Conversation21st Century Cynichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03953005554864241158noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-808773819247718476.post-11121428676950643972010-07-22T09:14:54.429-04:002010-07-22T09:14:54.429-04:00I never said "necessarily"... And the go...I never said "necessarily"... And the government tends to think the law does seem to violate federal law: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/07/us/07immig.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=arizona%20immigration%20law&st=cseAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-808773819247718476.post-27810515464279439102010-07-21T17:28:54.115-04:002010-07-21T17:28:54.115-04:00Not necessarily, only if it contradicts federal la...Not necessarily, only if it contradicts federal law--which it doesn't seem to. It simply sets a state-wide standard of enforcement.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-808773819247718476.post-72730903318060305562010-07-20T18:03:22.387-04:002010-07-20T18:03:22.387-04:00I like your blog!
Contrary to what you state in ...I like your blog! <br /><br />Contrary to what you state in this entry, the Arizona bill is arguably not constitutional because it violates the Federal preemption rule.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com